The People's Republic of China
China refutes 'two dozen lies' by US politicians over COVID-19 pandemic https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/ https://www.presstv.com/Detail/2020/05/10/625044/China-US-Trump--Pompeo-Corona-COVID19 China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs in an article has strongly refuted two dozen "preposterous allegations" and "false claims" by some leading US politicians over its handling of the new coronavirus outbreak. The 30-page article posted on the ministry's website on Saturday night rebutted 24 untrue claims from the US, including calling the novel coronavirus "the Chinese virus" or "Wuhan virus" and claims that the Wuhan Institute of Virology created the virus. The article said that all evidence shows the virus is not man-made and that the institute is not capable of synthesizing a new coronavirus. Rejecting suggestions by US President Donald Trump and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo that the new coronavirus should be called the "Chinese virus", the article cited documents from the World Health Organization (WHO) to say the name of a virus should not be country-specific. It also roundly rejected accusations by US politicians, especially Pompeo, that China had withheld information about the new coronavirus. The piece of writing cited media reports that said Americans had been infected with the virus before the first case was confirmed in Wuhan. The article provided a timeline of how China had provided information to the international community in a "timely", "open and transparent" manner to rebuke US suggestions that it had been slow to sound the alarm. PHOTO The article repeated and expanded on the refutations made during the press briefings, and began by invoking Abraham Lincoln, the 19th century US president. "As Lincoln said, you can fool some of the people all the time and fool all the people some of the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time," it said in the prologue. It rejected Western criticism of Beijing's handling of the case of Li Wenliang, a 34-year-old doctor who had tried to raise the alarm over the outbreak of the new virus in Wuhan. His death from COVID-19, the respiratory disease caused by the virus, prompted an outpouring of grief and was later named among "martyrs" mourned by China. The ministry article said Li was not a "whistle-blower" and he was never arrested, contrary to many Western reports. PHOTO Trump has described the coronavirus pandemic as the worst attack ever on his country while pointing the finger at China, saying the outbreak has hit the United States harder than the Japanese bombing of Pearl Harbor during WW ll or the 9/11 attacks two decades ago, which led the country to wage two deadly wars against Iraq and Afghanistan. PHOTO China believes that the US president is trying to divert attention from his poor handling of the coronavirus outbreak in his country in order to back up his presidential bid. Trump claimed last week that he had seen evidence linking the virus to a lab in the Chinese city of Wuhan and threatened new trade tariffs on China. US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo also said there is “enormous evidence" backing the coronavirus-leak scenario. The World Health Organization, senior US scientists and even the US intelligence community have rejected the claim despite pressure from the White House. Below are the 24 false claims and truths listed by the Chinese Foreign Ministry. No.1 Lie: The novel coronavirus is the "Chinese virus" or "Wuhan virus." Fact: The World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines have advised against giving infectious diseases names that associate them with specific countries and regions. No.2 Lie: Wuhan is the origin of the COVID-19 outbreak. Fact: Although the city first reported the outbreak, Wuhan is not necessarily the origin of the virus. The origin of COVID-19 is still unknown. Its source should remain a matter of science and should only be determined by scientists and medical experts based on scientific facts. No.3 Lie: COVID-19 was created by the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Fact: All of the evidence so far has shown that the virus evolved naturally. It is not man-made. No.4 Lie: COVID-19 was accidentally leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Fact: The P4 laboratory at the Wuhan Institute of Virology is a collaborative project with the French government. It is not capable of designing and producing COVID-19, and there is no evidence that any sort of virus leaked from the lab or that any staff got infected. No.5 Lie: China could have contained the outbreak from spreading outside Wuhan, but it let the virus spread to the world by not limiting international flights. Fact: China implemented the most restrictive prevention and control measures in the shortest possible time to prevent major outbreaks in places other than Wuhan. The statistics show that only a few imported cases are from China. No.6 Lie: Chinese people contracted the coronavirus from eating bats. Fact: Bats are never Chinese people's cooking ingredients. No.7 Lie: China reopened its wildlife market. It should close its "wet market" immediately. Fact: China does have "wet markets." China has completely banned the illegal hunting and trading of wild animals. No.8 Lie: China's initial cover-up of the outbreak has led to the virus spreading to the world. Fact: The outbreak was caused by a new type of virus, which required time to fully understand it. China has published the related information in an open, transparent and responsible manner. No.9 Lie: China arrested "whistleblower" Dr Li Wenliang. Fact: Dr Li Wenliang is not a "whistleblower," and he was not arrested. No.10 Lie: China's delayed report on human-to-human transmission mislead the United States and the world on how contagious and deadly the virus is, thus causing them to miss the opportunity to take early measures. Fact: China has been updating the WHO on the severity of the virus. The US should have been crystal clear about how lethal the virus is. No.11 Lie: China's data on COVID-19 is not transparent. The real number of confirmed and deceased COVID-19 cases is at least 50 times more than reported. Fact: China's released data is completely transparent and can stand the test of time. No.12 Lie: Wuhan's revision of the number of COVID-19 cases and fatalities proves that China covered up the actual number of infected patients during the initial stage of the outbreak. Fact: Data revision is a common international practice, which actually approves China is open, transparent and responsible in reporting the data. No.13 Lie: China spreads disinformation about the outbreak. Fact: China publishes COVID-19 data in an open and transparent way. But some US politicians and anti-China scholars have smeared China. China is a victim of disinformation. No.14 Lie: China's political system is the root of the problem. Fact: The virus doesn't distinguish ideology or social systems. The Communist Party of China and the Chinese government have played a decisive and crucial role in leading the Chinese people to prevail against the epidemic. China's political system has effectively organized and mobilized 1.4 billion people in China's vast territory of 9.6 million square kilometers to overcome the difficulties faced by developing countries. It unites all forces, pools all resources and provides a strong political guarantee to overcome the epidemic. It has been proven that the social system and development path chosen by the Chinese people fit China's domestic situation, and the Communist Party of China has won firm and broad support from Chinese people. China also has no intention of exporting its political system. No.15 Lie: China expelled US journalists to cover up the outbreak. Fact: China's expulsion of the US journalists is a reciprocal countermeasure against the US for its long-term suppression of Chinese media agencies in the US, especially the recent expulsion of 60 Chinese journalists. China releases information in a timely manner in an open, transparent and responsible manner. No.16 Lie: China controls the WHO and uses money to woo the organization. Fact: China firmly supports multilateralism. China has maintained good communication and cooperation with the WHO, but China has never manipulated the WHO. Notably, it is the US, the largest source of funding for the WHO, that has suspended funding of the international body, a move that was unanimously opposed by the international community. No.17 Lie: Taiwan issued a warning to the WHO about the human-to-human transmission of the new coronavirus pneumonia from as early as December 31, 2019, but it was not taken seriously. Fact: China's Taiwan region was not issuing a warning to the WHO, but seeking additional information from the WHO after the Wuhan Health Commission filed a report on COVID-19. No.18 Lie: China prevented Taiwan from joining the WHO and endangered the health of Taiwanese. Fact: The truth is, Taiwan, as a part of China, has no right to participate in the WHO that only sovereign states can join. The channels of technical cooperation between China's Taiwan and the WHO are always open. No.19 Lie: China should be held responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic. China should be investigated and sued for compensation. Fact: There is no legal basis for holding China responsible for the pandemic and asking for compensation. Such claims are just tricks some American politicians use to shift blame for their own political gain. No.20 Lie: China has hoarded protective medical resources, taking advantage of the pandemic to yield huge profits. It tightened the export of virus containment resources and equipment and limited exports, especially ventilators, which led to the US not having sufficient stocks. Fact: Although China's own virus containment is arduous, China is still doing its best to provide anti-COVID-19 medical supplies to other countries. No.21 Lie: China's assistance is "political generosity." Fact: China's foreign aid for fighting against the pandemic is sent to countries that supported China during the early phase of the outbreak. It is also based on the concept of a community of shared human destiny. No.22 Lie: China is interfering in the US election, trying to prevent US President Donald Trump from being re-elected. Fact: China has always adhered to the principle of non-interference in other countries' internal affairs. "Attacking China" is just a smear tactic that some US politicians are attempting to use as their campaign strategy. No.23 Lie: China recently required that enterprises that export masks, test kits, ventilators and other materials must provide customs with declaration forms, which can be seen as an attempt to ban the export of anti-COVID-19 medical supplies. Fact: The Chinese approach aims to strengthen quality control. No.24 Lie: China's Guangdong Province discriminated against African nationals. Fact: China's prevention and control measures never discriminate between Chinese and foreign nationals. It adopts a zero-tolerance attitude toward discriminatory words and deeds
http://nedactivitiesinchina.blogspot.com/search/label/Hong%20Kong
Meet Sir Gay Filimonov
The Build Up to the Attack on China: CIA Front NED and the 5th Column in China and Hong-Kong HONG KONG The National Endowment for Democracy (NED) was established as a conduit to disperse US Government funds for ‘promoting democracy’, allocated by Congress to its four core grantees. This blog contains details of the funds which have been dispersed by the NED for programs in China since 1994. SOURCE: KEVIN LAW http://nedactivitiesinchina.blogspot.com/search/label/China http://nedactivitiesinchina.blogspot.com/search/label/NED%20Annual%20Report http://nedactivitiesinchina.blogspot.com/search/label/Hong%20Kong Saturday, September 24, 2016 NED Grants in Hong Kong in 2015 According to the NED Annual Report for 2015, the following US Government funds were allocated by the US Congress and dispersed by the NED for programs in Hong Kong: Listed under NED Grants in China (Hong Kong): Expanding Worker Rights and Democracy Solidarity Center (SC) $195,465 To advance worker rights and democracy and strengthen civil society. The center will collaborate with partners to strengthen the organizing, negotiation, and advocacy skills of the Hong Kong trade unions regarding trade union and industrial relations issues. The project will also seek to promote understanding in the international labor and human rights communities about worker rights developments in China and to advocate for legal and judicial reforms that advance worker rights and collective bargaining. Listed under NED Grants – Asia Regional Promoting Public Dialogue on Political Reform in Hong Kong and China National Democratic Institute for International Affairs (NDI) $343,750 To promote public dialogue on political reform in Hong Kong and China. The institute will conduct an expert assessment mission to Hong Kong and draft a report for public dissemination and distribution to the diplomatic community, policymakers, and the media. The institute will invite international scholars and experts to conduct public seminars on comparative models of governance, and will also host workshops on legal advocacy to enable victims of violence to pursue protection, compensation, and justice. NED Annual Report 2015 – Grants to China (Hong Kong) NED Annual Report 2015 – Grants to China (Hong Kong)
NED Annual Report 2015 – Grants to Asia Regional, including Hong Kong
NED Grants in Hong Kong in 2014 According to the NED Annual Report for 2014, the following US Government funds were allocated by the US Congress and dispersed by the NED for programs in Hong Kong: Listed under NED Grants in China (Hong Kong) Solidarity Center Freedom of Association $154,669 Expanding Worker Rights and Democracy To advance worker rights and democracy and strengthen civil society in Hong Kong. The Solidarity Center will collaborate with its partners to strengthen the organizing, bargaining and advocacy skills of Hong Kong trade unions. The project will also seek to promote better understanding in the international labor and human rights communities about worker rights developments in China. Listed under NED Grants – Asia Regional National Democratic Institute for International Affairs Political Processes - $410,000 Amplifying Citizens’ Voices in Hong Kong & China To engage Hong Kong civic and political sectors in substantive dialogue around governance and electoral reform processes and to provide civic education for Chinese activists. NDI will assist efforts to promote citizens’ voices in Hong Kong’s political reform process and provide technical assistance to Chinese activists on organizational and advocacy skills. In Hong Kong, NDI will support online platforms and community initiatives that promote citizen-created models of governance. NDI will also conduct a young women’s leadership initiative. National Democratic Institute for International Affairs Political Processes - Supplement: $51,210 Amplifying Citizens’ Voices in Hong Kong To amplify citizens’ voices in Hong Kong’s political reform process and provide technical assistance to mainland Chinese activists on organizational and advocacy skills. In Hong Kong, NDI will support online platforms and community initiatives that promote citizen-created models of governance. NDI will also conduct a young women’s leadership initiative for up to 20 participants from mainland China and Hong Kong. NED Annual Report 2014 – Grants to China (Hong Kong)
NED Annual Report 2014 – Grants to Asia Regional, including Hong Kong
NED Annual Report 2014 – False rebuttal that the
NED was involved in organising the Occupy Central protests NED Grants in Hong Kong in 2013 According to the NED Annual Report for 2013, the following US Government funds were allocated by the US Congress and dispersed by the NED for programs in Hong Kong: Listed under NED Grants in China (Hong Kong) Hong Kong Human Rights Monitor $145,000 Protecting Human Rights and Encouraging Democratic Representation in Hong Kong To improve human rights protection and democratic representation in Hong Kong. The Monitor will carry out advocacy, human rights monitoring, casework, campaigning, and public education drawing local and international attention to civil rights and human rights developments in Hong Kong. Solidarity Center $150,031 Expanding Worker Rights and Democracy Listed under NED Grants – Asia Regional National Democratic Institute for International Affairs - $400,000 - Enhancing Representative Governance - To strengthen the ability of mainland Chinese civil society organizations (CSOs) to request and publicize information under China's open government regulations, and to strengthen the ability of Hong Kong CSOs to conduct organized monitoring of legislative processes. In both contexts, NDI will work with CSO partners to shed light on government actions and contribute to greater accountability and better governance. NED Annual Report 2013 – Grants to China (Hong Kong)
NED Annual Report 2013 – Grants to Asia Regional, including Hong Kong
NED Grants in Hong Kong in 2012 According to the NED Annual Report for 2012, the following US Government funds were allocated by the US Congress and dispersed by the NED for programs in Hong Kong: American Center for International Labor Solidarity $139,532 To continue to advance worker rights by building the capacity of democratic trade unions in Hong Kong. The Solidarity Center will work with its partners to advocate for collective bargaining rights, utilize local and international mechanisms to improve working conditions, and promote understanding of worker rights abuses and developments in China among the international labor movement and human rights community. Hong Kong Human Rights Monitor $155,000 To raise the standards of human rights protection
and democratic representation in Hong Kong. The Monitor will carry out human
rights monitoring, casework, campaigning, and public education drawing local
and international attention to civil rights and human rights developments in
Hong Kong. $460,000 To foster awareness regarding Hong Kong's political institutions and constitutional reform process and to develop the capacity of citizens - particularly university students - to more effectively participate in the public debate on political reform, NDI will work with civil society organizations on parliamentary monitoring, a survey, and development of an Internet portal, allowing students and citizens to explore possible reforms leading to universal suffrage. NED Annual Report 2012 – Grants to China (Hong Kong) NED Grants in Hong Kong in 2011 According to the NED Annual Report for 2011, the following US Government funds were allocated by the US Congress and dispersed by the NED for programs in Hong Kong: American Center for International Labor Solidarity $153,106 To expand worker rights by building the capacity of democratic trade unions in Hong Kong. The Solidarity Center will work with its local partners to advocate for collective bargaining rights, promote citizens' political and community engagement on workplace issues, and raise international awareness of worker rights developments and violations in mainland China, Hong Kong and Macau. Hong Kong Human Rights Monitor $170,000 To raise the standards of human rights protection and democratic representation in Hong Kong. The Monitor will carry out human rights reporting, casework, campaigning, and public education drawing local and international attention to civil rights and human rights developments in Hong Kong. NED Annual Report 2011 – Grants to China (Hong Kong) NED Grants in Hong Kong in 2010 According to the NED Annual Report for 2010, the following US Government funds were allocated by the US Congress and dispersed by the NED for programs in Hong Kong: American Center for International Labor Solidarity $148,869 To promote freedom of association by strengthening
democratic trade unions in Hong Kong. The Solidarity Center will work with
its local partners to support collective bargaining, membership organizing,
civic empowerment and research. NED Grants in Hong Kong in 2009 According to the NED Annual Report for 2009, the following US Government funds were allocated by the US Congress and dispersed by the NED for programs in Hong Kong: American Center for International Labor Solidarity $130,860 To promote freedom of association by building the capacity of democratic trade unions in Hong Kong. The Solidarity Center will work with its local partner to support initiatives for collective bargaining, member organizing and civic empowerment. Hong Kong Human Rights Monitor $170,000 To raise the standards of human rights protection and democratic representation in Hong Kong. The Monitor will carry out human rights reporting, casework, campaigning, and public education drawing local and international attention to civil rights and human rights developments in Hong Kong. National Democratic Institute for International Affairs (NDI) $272,140 To advance the dialogue between citizens and political actors on constitutional reforms. Through sponsoring public forums and a political participation website, NDI will support local civil society organizations to analyze and provide recommendations on the government’s proposal for constitutional reform. NED Annual Report 2009 – Grants to China (Hong Kong) NED Grants in Hong Kong in 2008 According to the NED Annual Report for 2008, the following US Government funds were allocated by the US Congress and dispersed by the NED for programs in Hong Kong: American Center for International Labor Solidarity $125,456 To foster freedom of association and other worker rights in China and Hong Kong. Local partners will seek to strengthen civil society by building members’ advocacy capacity, expanding the current labor union base, encouraging the participation of unions and their members in democratic processes, strengthening a migrant workers assistance network, and increasing union members’ access to legal assistance and knowledge of labor law. Civic Exchange $59,967* To engage the public in discussion of governance reforms. Civic Exchange will carry out a diverse program of research and public education on key topics related to universal suffrage and electoral and constitutional reform. Hong Kong Human Rights Monitor $170,000* To raise the standards of human rights protection and democratic representation in Hong Kong. The Monitor will carry out human rights reporting, casework, campaigning, and public education drawing local and international attention to civil and human rights developments in Hong Kong. NED Annual Report 2008 – Grants to China (Hong Kong) NED Grants in Hong Kong in 2007 According to the NED Annual Report for 2007, the following US Government funds were allocated by the US Congress and dispersed by the NED for programs in Hong Kong: American Center for International Labor Solidarity $135,000 To foster freedom of association and other worker rights in China and Hong Kong. Local partners will seek to strengthen civil society by expanding the current labor union base, encouraging the participation of unions and their members in democratic processes, strengthening a migrant workers assistance network, and increasing union members’ access to legal assistance and knowledge of labor law. Civic Exchange $64,983* To engage the public in discussion of governance reforms. Civic Exchange will carry out a diverse program of research and public education on key topics related to universal suffrage and electoral and constitutional reform. Hong Kong Human Rights Monitor $170,000* To raise the standards of human rights protection and democratic representation. The Monitor will carry out human rights reporting, casework, campaigning, and public education drawing local and international attention to civil and human rights developments in Hong Kong. NED Annual Report 2007 – Grants to China (Hong Kong)
NED Grants in Hong Kong in 2006 According to the NED Annual Report for 2006, the following US Government funds were allocated by the US Congress and dispersed by the NED for programs in Hong Kong: American Center for International Labor Solidarity $125,000 To foster freedom of association and other worker rights. ACILS will support local trade-union education and outreach programs, as well as a research program raising international awareness regarding the current labor-rights situation in China. Civic Exchange $86,000* To engage the public in discussion of governance reforms. Civic Exchange will carry out a diverse program of research and public education on key topics related to universal suffrage and electoral and constitutional reform. Hong Kong Human Rights Monitor $175,000* To raise the standards of human rights protection and democratic representation. The Monitor will carry out human rights reporting, casework, campaigning, and public education drawing local and international attention to civil and human rights developments in Hong Kong. NED Annual Report 2006 – Grants to China (Hong Kong) NED Grants in Hong Kong in 2005 According to the NED Annual Report for 2005, the following US Government funds were allocated by the US Congress and dispersed by the NED for programs in Hong Kong: Civic Exchange $45,000* To promote informed debate on constitutional reform. Civic Exchange will carry out public opinion research and hold a public debate on models of constitutional reform, publish two papers that discuss selected reforms in mainland China and their relevance as points of reference for Hong Kong, and conduct outreach to the public on the broad spectrum of reform concerns. Hong Kong Human Rights Monitor $173,000* To raise the standards of human rights protection and democratic representation. The Monitor will carry out human rights reporting, casework, campaigning, and public education drawing local and international attention to civil and human rights developments in Hong Kong. NED Annual Report 2005 – Grants to China (Hong Kong) NED Grants in Hong Kong in 2004 According to the NED Annual Report for 2004, the following US Government funds were allocated by the US Congress and dispersed by the NED for programs in Hong Kong: Civic Exchange $125,000* To build support for a democratic constitution. Civic Exchange will engage the public in consideration of potential constitutional reforms and advocate that the government seek citizen approval of any proposed constitution. Activities will consist of reports on Hong Kong's functional constituency system and the role of public dialogue in political development, as well as the organization of public forums, town hall style gatherings and formal debates. Hong Kong Human Rights Monitor $173,280* To carry out a broad ranging program of education and monitoring to draw local and international attention to human rights and constitutional developments in Hong Kong. The Monitor will produce educational materials, issue in-depth reports, conduct programs in conjunction with schools and civic groups, hold a human rights film festival and organize public seminars. National Democratic Institute for International Affairs (NDI) $190,000 To strengthen political parties and support democratic activism. NDI will conduct political party consultations and training seminars; facilitate the development and publication of a multi-party public opinion poll and provide assistance in the development of voter guides in advance of the Legislative Council elections in September 2004. National Democratic Institute for International Affairs (NDI) $50,000* To work to improve the ability of Hong Kong civil society organizations to advocate for democratization and good governance in Hong Kong. NDI will support a Hong Kong partner to conduct a governance review and undertake a post-election assessment following the Legislative Council elections in September 2004. NED Grants in Hong Kong in 2003 According to the NED Annual Report for 2003, the following US Government funds were allocated by the US Congress and dispersed by the NED for programs in Hong Kong: American Center for International Labor Solidarity US$260,434 To collaborate with the Hong Kong Confederation of Trade Unions and other Hong Kong-based labor rights NGOs to provide basic training and education on trade union rights and other labor rights. The coalition will strengthen the work of the Yuen Long training center, which conducts leadership workshops, educates unemployed workers in government-sponsored job retraining courses, and conducts research to determine what types of manpower training and skills assessment best serve the needs of the workers in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Human Rights Monitor $60,000 To carry out human rights reporting, casework, campaigning and public education, drawing local and international attention to civil and human rights developments in Hong Kong. National Democratic Institute for International Affairs $179,999 To provide technical assistance and training to Hong Kong political parties to strengthen the role of parties in Hong Kong, and to support pro-democracy civil society organizations in their efforts to draw attention to the deterioration of political rights in the territory. NED Grants in Hong Kong in 2002 According to the NED Annual Report for 2002, the following US Government funds were allocated by the US Congress and dispersed by the NED for programs in Hong Kong: Listed under NED Grants in China American Center for International Labor Solidarity $198,063 To assist democratic unions and labor rights organizations in Hong Kong that are working to protect worker and union rights in the South China region. National Democratic Institute for International Affairs $205,076 To organize resources and activities, in partnership with the Center for the Study of People’s Congress and Foreign Legislatures at Peking University Law School, in order to educate Chinese legislative members and staff, researchers, and students about democratic legislative norms and processes; and to provide materials, direct technical assistance, and other resources to Hong Kong organizations advocating for democratic reform in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Listed under NED Grants in Hong Kong Hong Kong Human Rights Monitor $51,000 To carry out human rights reporting, casework, campaigning, and public education, drawing local and international public attention to areas of Hong Kong law and practice that fail to safeguard human rights. NED Grants in Hong Kong in 2001 According to the NED Annual Report for 2001, the following US Government funds were allocated by the US Congress and dispersed by the NED for programs in Hong Kong: Listed under NED Grants in China American Center for International Labor Solidarity $198,073 To assist democratic unions and labor rights organizations in Hong Kong that are working to protect worker and union rights in the South China region. National Democratic Institute for International
Affairs To provide comparative research findings to educate legislative staff members, researchers and students on democratic norms; organize two seminars on democratic legislative processes; and assist democratic reform in Hong Kong. Listed under NED Grants in Hong Kong Hong Kong Human Rights Monitor $51,000 To combine legal defense of civil rights with public campaigns and education to cultivate public opinion favorable to democratization and the rule of law. NED Grants in Hong Kong in 2000 According to the NED Annual Report for 2000, the following US Government funds were allocated by the US Congress and dispersed by the NED for programs in Hong Kong: Listed under China The American Center for International Labor Solidarity - $184,560 To assist democratic unions and labor rights organizations in Hong Kong working to protect worker and union rights in the South China region. Listed under Hong Kong Hong Kong Human Rights Monitor - $48,000 To carry out human rights reporting, casework, campaigning and public education drawing local and international public attention to the Hong Kong laws and practices that fail to safeguard human rights. NED Grants in Hong Kong in 1999 According to the NED Annual Report for 1999, the following US Government funds were allocated by the US Congress and dispersed by the NED for programs in Hong Kong: Listed under China American Center for International Labor Solidarity - $202,399 To support the work of the Hong Kong-based China Labour Bulletin to investigate and document labor conditions and worker activism in China. The program also includes support for labor and human rights education efforts to inform workers about their rights under national and local laws. American Center for International Labor Solidarity - $170,997 To provide support to the Hong Kong Confederation of Trade Unions to improve its membership outreach and coalition-building activities. ACILS will also support the research and documentation activities of a labor rights NGO concentrating on conditions in southern China. Listed under Hong Kong Hong Kong Human Rights Monitor - $48,000 To campaign for improvements in legal and institutional human rights safeguards in Hong Kong. The Monitor will continue its program of human rights reporting, case work, campaigning, and public education, and will also participate in the U.N. human rights fora. National Democratic Institute for International Affairs - $67,164 To support democracy activists as they define their role in the new political system in Hong Kong that limits opportunities for public input into the policy-making process. The program will offer consultations to political parties competing for seats on directly elected local governments, and conduct a training program on grassroots organizing and volunteer recruitment. NED Grants in Hong Kong in 1998 According to the NED Annual Report for 1998, the following US Government funds were allocated by the US Congress and dispersed by the NED for programs in Hong Kong: Hong Kong – Listed under China American Center for International Labor Solidarity - $343,778 To help the China Labor Bulletin, the Hong Kong Confederation of Trade Unions, and Hong Kong-based labor rights groups promote worker and union rights in the greater China region. Hong Kong Human Rights Monitor - $45,000 To draw local and international public attention to areas of Hong Kong law which fail to safeguard human rights. Hong Kong Human Rights Monitor projects include human rights reporting, casework, campaigning, and public education. National Democratic Institute for International Affairs - $141,877 To monitor the state of civil and political liberties in Hong Kong and its progress toward a genuinely democratic electoral system. NDI supported a democratic assessment team that analyzed the political environment and technical preparations for the May 1998 polls. NED Grants in Hong Kong in 1997 According to the NED Annual Report for 1997, the following US Government funds were allocated by the US Congress and dispersed by the NED for programs in Hong Kong: Hong Kong Human Rights Monitor - $40,000 To focus local and international public attention on areas of Hong Kong law and practice that fail to safeguard human rights. The Monitor works to strengthen the foundations of and commitment to the rule of law in Hong Kong. National Democratic Institute for International Affairs - $100,120 To monitor the development of Hong Kong's "post-reversion" election framework, the election process, and the ability of political parties and civic groups to participate in the process. NED Grants in Hong Kong in 1996 According to the NED Annual Report for 1996, the following US Government funds were allocated by the US Congress and dispersed by the NED for programs in Hong Kong: Listed under NED Grants in China Free Trade Union Institute - $359,393 Through the Asian American Free Labor Institute: for the monitoring of labor rights violations and dissemination of information on rights to workers in China; for the Hong Kong Confederation of Trade Unions to retain member support after the Chinese takeover through contributions to public debate, regular distribution of a newsletter, and maintenance of their headquarters as a rallying point and resource center for democracy activists; and for a regional conference to expand cooperation among labor activists from Hong Kong, Taiwan, Macao, and China. University of Hong Kong Faculty of Law - $60,000 To equip and train three additional local partners in China to expand the Law-on-Line project, a bilingual database of information and documentation on human rights laws and legal issues available on the Internet. Listed under NED Grants in Hong Kong Hong Kong Human Rights Monitor - $36,000 To hire a full-time staff director to coordinate the organization's work in human rights reporting, casework, campaigning, and public education. MORE CHINA Saturday, September 24, 2016 NED Grants in China in 2015 According to the NED Annual Report for 2015, the following US Government funds were allocated by the US Congress and dispersed by the NED for programs in China: Advancing Citizen Priorities through Civil Society
and Accountable Governance To promote progress toward an accountable, representative, and inclusive political system in China, the organization will support independent non-governmental organizations and reform-minded individuals to foster civic engagement, promote capacity building, and incubate inclusive governance practices. Activities will include conducting town hall meetings, promoting participatory models for budget reform, partnering with an academic institution to host a forum, and establishing an electronic resource library. Advocating for Chinese Civil Society NED Grants in China in 2014 According to the NED Annual Report for 2014, the following US Government funds were allocated by the US Congress and dispersed by the NED for programs in China: Asia Catalyst, Inc. NED Grants in China in 2013 According to the NED Annual Report for 2013, the
following US Government funds were allocated by the US Congress and
dispersed by the NED for programs in China: NED Grants in China in 2012 According to the NED Annual Report for 2012, the following US Government funds were allocated by the US Congress and dispersed by the NED for programs in China: Accountability NED Grants in China in 2011 According to the NED Annual Report for 2011, the
following US Government funds were allocated by the US Congress and
dispersed by the NED for programs in China: NED Grants in China in 2010 According to the NED Annual Report for 2010, the following US Government funds were allocated by the US Congress and dispersed by the NED for programs in China: Accountability and Public Participation $479,200 To enhance the public's awareness of their legal rights and to help build norms of government accountability. Projects will support a variety of educational, research, public policy, outreach, NGO capacity-building, and legal activities. Rule of Law $315,000 To improve the implementation of law in China and to help raise awareness of citizens' and officials' rights and responsibilities. The projects will raise legal rights awareness, provide legal outreach and aid, hold lectures and seminars, support reforms and legal training, and build support for public interest law. American Center for International Labor Solidarity $146,199 To enhance the grassroots organizing and advocacy skills of worker rights activists, academics and students. The Solidarity Center will support a range of worker rights advocates to educate and empower workers to protect their rights. The Solidarity Center will provide training in practical skills for selected advocates, labor law reformers and practitioners and develop collective bargaining and other labor rights materials. American Center for International Labor Solidarity $131,954 To strengthen rule of law by promoting labor rights enforcement. The Solidarity Center and its long-time partner will work to enhance the advocacy skills and online networking ability of labor lawyers and workers rights groups, as well as to foster international solidarity with grassroots labor rights protection initiatives. Asia Catalyst, Inc. $199,476 To improve Chinese NGOs’ operational capacity. Asia
Catalyst will organize training programs for NGO staff and volunteers,
including workshops on decision-making and other internal governance
processes, provide short-term consulting services for a variety of groups,
work with selected organizations to build management skills, and develop
online tools accessible to the broader community of NGOs. To promote human rights in China. The Princeton China Initiative will carry out a broad program of support for human rights projects to enhance transparency, accountability, legal knowledge, and access to justice. Princeton China Initiative $20,000 (supplement) To promote human rights in China. The Princeton China Initiative will carry out a broad program of support for human rights projects to enhance transparency, accountability, legal knowledge, and access to justice. Princeton China Initiative $119,700 (supplement) To promote media freedoms and civic engagement via the Internet in China. The Princeton China Initiative’s China Digital Network program will bring together specialists in internet technology to exchange information and create online tools that can be used by ordinary Chinese citizens, journalists and social activists for “citizen journalism” and civic-oriented, open communication. Southern Mongolian Human Rights Information Center $88,000 To advance the human rights of ethnic Mongols living in the Southern Mongolia region of China. SMHRIC will report on the human rights conditions in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, also known as Southern Mongolia, through its website and its English- and Mongolian-language electronic publication, Southern Mongolian Watch. Wei Jingsheng Foundation, Inc. $54,300 To promote awareness among Chinese workers of their rights and to inform the international community about the labor rights situation in China. The Foundation will maintain its website, distribute information to China, and give frequent interviews through print and electronic mediums to the international and Chinese press. ![]()
Grapples with Intensifying Foreign Meddling in Island Unrests https://en.farsnews.com/newstext.aspx?nn=13980609001144 August 31, 2019 TEHRAN (FNA)- Messaging app Telegram plans to allow users to cloak their telephone numbers to safeguard Hong Kong protesters against monitoring by authorities, a person with direct knowledge of the effort disclosed.
In an Excusive report, Reuters said the update to Telegram, planned for release over the next few days, will allow protesters to prevent Chinese and Hong Kong authorities from discovering their identities in the app’s large group chats, as some demonstrators express concern that authorities could use the movement’s reliance on Telegram to monitor and arrest organizers. Thousands of Hong Kong protesters take their cues from more than 100 groups on Telegram, according to protest organizers and supporters. The groups are used to post everything from news on upcoming demonstrations to tips on dousing tear gas canisters fired by the police to the identities of suspected undercover police and the access codes to buildings in Hong Kong where protesters can hide. Hong Kong has for twelve weeks been the scene of protests over an extradition bill that would have allowed suspects to be tried in mainland courts. Although the authorities have suspended the bill since, the demonstrators have made additional demands, while brandishing US and UK flags and clashing with police. China has stressed that foreign countries, mainly the United States and Britain, have been provoking the protesters by issuing statements of support. Beijing has asked the two countries to stop meddling in Hong Kong’s affairs. The Chinese foreign ministry warned the administration of US President Donald Trump that it should not “stick their noses in our affairs”, issuing a reminder that Hong Kong is a Chinese territory and is neither “American” nor “English”. Telegram is a non-profit cloud-based instant messaging service and has played a similar role in intensifying unrests in other countries. The social media outlet that has millions of users in Iran played a key role in similar unrests in Iran in early 2018, forcing officials to ban the application "over the harm it has done to the country’s security, culture and economy in the past few years". Several major cities in Iran, including Tehran, Mashhad, Isfahan and Rasht, were hit by street protests in January, 2018. People took to the streets to protest against unemployment and the rising costs of living. Though the numbers were low and never went beyond a few thousand, local protests in the Northeastern city of Mashhad found a well-detailed and complicated organization and started to spread to a number of other cities since day 3. Investigation results appearing after the interrogation of a number of protest organizers later disclosed Telegram's major role in spread, organization and deterioration of unrests. Few months earlier, Head of Iran's Civil Defense Organization Brigadier General Gholam Reza Jalali had revealed that Telegram had sold the information shared by the Iranian users to the US, Israel and Mojahedin-e Khalq Organization (MKO, also known as the MEK, PMOI and NCRI) terrorist group. Jalali initially made the revelation in October 2017, but later disclosed more details when he repeated the warning in January 2018. "Pavel Durov, the owner, is not paid by us for providing Telegram services, but, he sells this (the Iranian users') information to those who need it for analyzing (the situation in) Iran," General Jalali said, addressing the Civil Defense Organization managers in Tehran on January 30, 2018. "Certainly, our information in Telegram has special customers, including the Americans, the Zionist regime, Monafeqin (hypocrites, as MKO members are called in Iran) and any group with operational power (for moves) against us," he added. Later interrogations also revealed that a majority of 2018 protest organizers in Iran were MKO members. Months later, the then Chairman of the Iranian Parliament's National Security and Foreign Policy Commission, Alaeddin Boroujerdi, described Telegram messaging service as a national security threat that should be replaced by a national messenger. "Because of Telegram's security threats, countries have blocked it and are using national and domestic messengers and networks," Boroujerdi said in May, 2018. The senior legislator pointed to the close relations between Telegram CEO Pavel Durov and Israel, and said the social network servicing application played a major role in Winter, 2018 riots. The local protests that started against a number of private funds in Mashhad and other economic deficiencies and problems deteriorated into riots that saw even shooting at a police station in a town in Southwestern Iran, astonishing analysts in just a few days, astonishing observers. By the end of the first week, tens of Telegram channels almost entirely run from oversees were not only inciting people to take part in riots by misinforming the public and releasing abundant fake news, but also training them how to make weapons, including molotov cocktails, releasing lists of police, military and state targets, organizing attacks and releasing the news, photos and videos of these armed attacks. Despite repeated requests by Iranian officials, Durov remained adamant to shutting down these channels and in one single case that he did, the CEO allowed the Channel to rename to continue its operation. Eventually in May, 2018, The Iranian Judiciary issued an order to completely ban the Telegram messaging application. Tehran prosecutor's office for culture and media said in a statement that it had ordered Internet service providers across the country to fully block the access to the Telegram application on April 30, 2018. The statement further said that the decree was handed down after Tehran chief prosecutor’s office received numerous complaints from Iranian citizens calling for the closure of the messenger altogether. It added that the decision was also made after requests were filed by judicial authorities and relevant bodies for putting an end to the uncontrollable and illegal activity of the cloud-based instant messaging service. The statement also said that the order against the Telegram was also issued because the application has been founded by foreign investments and operates with disregard to the rules and regulations of the Islamic Republic of Iran, illegally entering into Iran's cyberspace. Storing and processing private data of Iranian people outside the country, inflicting damage to the country’s economy through ignoring Iran’s banking system’s regulations and designing and promoting a cryptocurrency known as the Gram coin, and paving the way, as a medium, for causing rift in the national unity through provoking chaos and riot were among the reasons mentioned for the closure of the Telegram. The statement also added that the app played a pivotal role in last year's riots that claimed the lives of citizens and injured others while incurring huge financial loses to public assets.
August 31, 2019 - Like the Maidan it appeared that it would be a flash in the pan and that it would be over quickly. The actors were outed, the methods are known, the reasons and figures identified, all they have to do is round up the traitors, the foreign paid provacateurs and the CIA/MI6 controllers and that is it, end of story. Wrong. The demonstrations and protests t have not stopped since March 31 even after the protestors initial condition of withdrawing an extradition bill was met.
08.10 Hong Kong: CIA Outraged That Their Subversion Officer is Named, State Screams Foul - Julie Eadeh: CIA Spook Under Cover as Political Officer at US Embassy (Who else leads a team of two Marine Corps platoons in the middle of a war zone?) https://ccas.georgetown.edu/article/serving-citizens-abroad-in-times-of-war/ Two days after Hezbollah’s raid into Israel and one day after the Israeli response, the Department of State and the Department of Defense began preparations to evacuate American citizens from Lebanon, setting the stage for what came to be the largest overseas evacuation of American citizens since the Second World War. Working alongside the two Marine platoons assigned to Lebanon was a tremendous honor. The 24th Marine Expeditionary Unit was the same unit that had suffered a tragic attack against the Marine barracks in Lebanon on October 3, 1983. The Marines were consummate professionals and their courage and expertise in their first return to Lebanon since 1983 were the lynchpin for the operation’s overall success. The strength of the Lebanese local employees of the U.S. embassy, including some who survived the embassy bombing in 1983, as they stood alongside their American colleagues to help Americans in distress as their own country was being bombarded, speaks to the resilience and courage of the human spirit. But the Lebanon example is but one of many. The most rewarding aspect of a career in diplomacy has been developing relationships with locals and foreign officials to address challenges both on a political, policy level but even more fundamental and perhaps more important, on a human level. In nearly two decades as a diplomat, I have learned that relationships transcend time and place, and all peoples share universal hopes and concerns. Most importantly, I have learned that diplomacy is the art of turning contacts into friends, and friends into partners as we work together to solve common challenges, contribute to global development, and work towards achieving shared goals. Julie A. Eadeh is a Political Counselor at the U.S. Consulate General in Hong Kong. She graduated from MAAS in 2002 https://news.cgtn.com/news/2019-08-10/Who-has-stirred-Hong-Kong-chaos--J2cVBSCzZu/index.html https://latest-today-news.com/evidence-of-cia-meeting-hk-protest-leaders-china-summons-us-diplomats https://zerohedge.whotrades.com/blog/43416982623 http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1160764.shtml
Western_Leaders_Idiots_Chinese_Competent_Part_1.pdf Western_Leaders_Idiots_Chinese_Competent_Part_2.pdf All_Wars_Satanic_Elite_Conspiracies_Against_Humanity.pdf Illuminati_Formula_for_Undetectable_Total_Mind_Control_Slave.pdf Origins_and_Techniques_of_Monarch_Mind_Control.pdf The_Secret_Wars_of_the_CIA.pdf
Note: Jeff Brown Does NOT Live in the People's Republic of China By Jeff J. Brown 2 September 2019 Crosslinked with:
https://chinarising.puntopress.com/2019/09/02/belt-and-road-initiative-bri-donald-trump-and-the-falsity-of-imperialisms-narrative-why-bri-is-the-perfect-opportunity-for-china-to-neutralize-500-years-of-the-wests-racist-super/
Pictured above: no one has seen the likes of a cartoon demagogue, like Donald Trump in such a high seat of power on the world stage. Whether he was an electoral goof-up by the deep state or their man to create the chaos they need to steal more of the world’s wealth and possibly justify an eventual fascist coup d’état, remains to be seen. But in the interim, communist-socialist China and its BRI loom large over the global horizon, ready to take center stage. How Baba Beijing responds may determine humanity's fate. Background explanation before starting: I am deeply honored that this paper was recently published in a Chinese national institute’s journal. They decided to publish a special edition focused on the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). For two years, they have been collecting articles. Another journalist and I were the only two foreigners having the honor of being included in the collection. Herewith is the original English article. Looking back when I wrote it two years ago, it is very historically relevant. At the time, Donald Trump had been in the White House for less than a year and everything I predicted about the West’s response to BRI has come true. 2017.10.25 Author’s note: as this paper is being submitted, the CPC’s successful 19th Party Congress has just concluded. Its “New Era of Chinese Socialism” and 21st century vision for humanity will be taken as a public declaration of world war by Western empire’s deep state, and it will respond accordingly. Therefore, to use two popular English terms, yes, the following proposals are “out of the box” (original) and “off the wall” (counterintuitive), but they are now more relevant and urgent than ever before, not only for BRI, but for the sake of the whole planet. I am honored that your institute has invited me to write an article about China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), a history changing, visionary blueprint launched by Chinese President Xi Jinping in 2013. It includes two parts. First is the overland Silk Road Economic Belt (SREB), largely covering the Eurasian continent and on into Africa. The SREB harks back to the ancient Silk Roads that linked China to the rest of Eurasia. The other half of BRI is the 21st Century Maritime Silk Road (MSR), which also connects to China’s past, this time, to seafaring exploration and trade going back thousands of years. While certainly a coincidence, the timing of establishing BRI and ongoing events being determined around the world by the West, are especially intriguing. After more than 500 year of ongoing colonial supremacy, there is no question that the arc of development of Western empire has entered into its decline phase. There are two books that explain this quite well and are both highly recommended reading. The Collapse of Complex Societies, by Joseph Tainter (http://www.wtf.tw/ref/tainter.pdf) and Collapse – How Societies Choose to Fail, by Jared Diamond (http://cpor.org/ce/Diamond(2005)Collapse-HowSocietiesChooseFailureSuccess.pdf). These books have intriguing hypotheses as to why all societies, over the long term, eventually fall. This is something China’s millennial history has experienced no fewer than six times, including most recently 1911, with the collapse of the Qing Dynasty. However, neither book considers Marxist-Leninist dialectics, which explain that every capitalist society is doomed to collapse by an ever upward spiraling concentration of wealth into fewer and fewer hands, with concomitant socioeconomic cannibalism, perpetual war in search of resources, and fascism to control the increasingly impoverished masses. Thus, by analyzing the hypotheses of Tainter and Diamond, and synthesizing theirs with Marxist-Leninist Theory, we can safely say that capitalist Western empire’s eventual collapse will be like no other in human history, given its systemic extremes and global reach on every continent. Do I want to be alive when it happens? For the sake of schadenfreude, yes. However, when it does arrive, the survival of the human race may be severely challenged or even extinguished, due to a final paroxysm of nuclear war, with the West and Israel hoping to cling to its colonial system of tyranny, exploitation and extraction. It may seem that I digress from the topic of BRI, but not really. Western imperialism is doing in spades what it does best against every country on Earth that is not a client state: economic extortion, geopolitical aggression, varying degrees of cold and hot war, as well as relentless, clandestine sabotage. This of course includes China. But more critically, any country that agrees to cooperate within BRI framework is, by imperial definition, an enemy of empire. The United States is supreme sovereign of Western empire. As they join BRI blueprint, America’s supposed allies (in reality client states), will be considered enemies within its own ranks. This includes most of Western Europe and the Middle Eastern states that are aligned in America’s global satrap hierarchy. The potential risk for these BRI partners to be on the receiving end of ever greater Western extortion and violence cannot be lost on China’s leadership. Much of this was couched and finessed within the norms of international diplomacy and Western alliances, until January 20th, 2017, when Donald Trump was inaugurated as America’s 45th president. The only clean elections in the United States happen at the neighborhood level (school districts, town councils). Above this level, they are frequently rigged (see China Rising – Capitalist Roads, Socialist Destinations, Pages 73-94, “A Tale of Two Democracies: What It Is Like to Vote in the United States Compared to France?”). I think Trump’s election was a miscalculation by America’s deep state, which includes Wall Street, the Department of Defense and its military contractors, the global oil bankers (Rockefeller, Rothschild, Morgan, etc.), the clandestine cliques (Central Intelligence Agency-CIA, National Security Administration-NSA, Defense Intelligence Agency-DIA, etc.) and their propaganda apparatus in the global mainstream media, Hollywood and New York City. Hillary Clinton was the chosen establishment puppet. Both sides undoubtedly cheated as usual. But the Clinton side underestimated Trump’s turnout and didn’t cheat enough, and whatever rigging the Trump side contributed was superfluous. There is the opposing speculation that in reality, the deep state made sure that Trump got elected, in order to create chaos and instability to such a point, so that the American public would readily accept a “legal” coup to remove him from office, and replace him with a military junta, under the guise of “Continuity of Government” (COG). COG was actually implemented after 9-11 in the United States (see Footnote #4 in http://www.voltairenet.org/article185257.html). More on 9-11 later. Either way, to say that all hell has broken loose in America, and by default, among its many client countries, is a gross understatement. One only has to look at the headlines, in any language across the globe, to realize this. Before Trump, BRI and Western empire were largely unrecognized to world citizens. BRI continues to barely make a blip on the global stage. This, while bombastic, mercurial, theatrical and deep state outsider President Trump is proving to be a megaphone for everything that is wrong and fake about the West, as well as being the perfect catalyst to accelerate its fall. So, what is China’s leadership and the Communist Party of China (CPC) to do, with the unbelievable circumstances happening, since Trump became US president? The last thing your institute needs is an article extolling the virtues of BRI. My goal here is to play the role of devil’s advocate, think outside the box and propose challenging ideas. This is in order to avoid complacency and to precipitate a conversation among China’s opinion makers and leaders, to possibly look at alternative options to assure the short- and long-term success of BRI. Even more frightening is the potential nuclear destruction of the human race, which could be too easily caused by China’s enemies, thus making BRI a moot point. Number Five of the 36 Stratagems of War is, “Loot a burning house”. I think we can all agree that President Trump is the gunpowder that has ignited the Western empire to flame. But, can China and its allies avoid getting badly burned in the process? The classic Chinese long game will not work if the West (including insane Israel) pulls the nuclear trigger. Even an exchange of 5-10 of today’s megaton hydrogen bombs would likely push Mother Earth’s delicate ecosystem into a humanity-ending nuclear winter. Why take the chance? I have a theory as to why even a burning Western house of fire (a collapsing empire) can maintain its dictatorial grip over much of the world’s people, and will likely continue to do so, until a powerful, anti-capitalist country like China adopts a new and smarter game plan. It is because of the West’s unparalleled global propaganda machine, which is aggressively pushed and obsessively managed by the aforementioned deep state. And the reason that the vast majority of humanity, including the Chinese people and their allies still give the West the benefit of the doubt, is due to the image that the deep state so artfully projects on all of us. Propaganda has been ceaselessly pushed on the world, since Alexander the Great’s murderous conquests, which happened across much of Asia in the 3rd century BC. This “Western Racist Superiority Paradigm” tells us that: 1. Western civilization is intellectually superior to the rest of the world. 2. Western civilization has no technical rival on Earth. 3. Western civilization is morally and spiritually above all other peoples. Sadly, the vast majority of the human race accepts this as fact, while outside of China, only a tiny percentage of humanity even knows what BRI is. This phenomenon has deep roots in racism. Around the planet, Caucasians are perceived to be mentally and morally superior to the world’s non-White races, proving just how successful the West’s pedantic mantra really is (see http://chinarising.puntopress.com/2018/01/06/slavs-and-the-yellow-peril-are-niggers-brutes-and-beasts-in-the-eyes-of-western-empire-china-rising-radio-sinoland/) . As BRI continues to advance, the West will use this successful superiority propaganda to destroy BRI’s “Chinese” (meaning racially inferior) credibility and reliability. The precedence is well established. Everywhere China goes to cooperate economically, the imperial West is right there to destroy the dream. As BRI continues to spread its wings, the deep state will be right there, spending billions to destroy it at every opportunity, having a terrible impact on China’s image, and causing untold suffering and losses with its BRI partners. The list is long, but look no further than Afghanistan, Ecuador, Iraq, Iran, Libya, Myanmar, Nigeria, North Korea, Philippines, Russia, Serbia, (South) Sudan, Syria, Ukraine and Venezuela, to name a few. Their cooperation with China is not the sole reason they have been attacked, and in some cases destroyed by imperial tyranny, but it is definitely an important contributing factor. China has two choices. One is to keep going along to get along and playing the long game, as the West slowly devours itself. The problem is, even though the Western house is ablaze, it is big and it is global, so it could take generations to finally implode, and in the meantime, nuclear holocaust hangs thickly in the air. Therefore, I propose to short-circuit this conundrum, by changing the world’s attitude, that everything Caucasians do must be better than anything the Chinese offer, including BRI. The only way to do this is to destroy the foundations upon which Westerners build their civilizational/racial superiority paradigm, that they are smarter, more creative, more just and righteous. In order to weaken these foundations, the best way is to attack them at their vulnerable points. The 36 Stratagem’s of War and Sun Zi’s Art of War consider a frontal assault, even if the enemy is weaker, as a last resort. Why needlessly lose so many soldiers and citizens, when victory can be won with elliptical strategies and asymmetric tactics? But, when the time is right to attack, one must be decisive, not hesitate and push through to victory. Chairman Mao and his generals brilliantly proved this to be true in the Korean and Sino-Indian Wars. Now is not the moment for a full face-to-face showdown with the West. But, with Donald Trump loudly personifying the West’s decline, the time is ripe for China to undermine empire, by elliptically attacking its weak points, while continuing to bolster BRI with its development partners. Below are five false Western narratives to exploit. Destroying their supposed veracity would greatly undermine the West’s Racist Superiority Paradigm of higher intelligence, greater creativity and superior morality. In chronological order, they are: 1) 15th century Age of Exploration 2) Germ Warfare during the Korean War 3) The John F. Kennedy, Martin Luther King Jr. and Robert F. Kennedy assassinations 4) Apollo moon landings 5) September 11, 2001 (9-11) 15th century Age of Exploration The whole Western Age of Exploration narrative is a cruel and cynical myth for two reasons. First, as explained in many books, notably An Indigenous Peoples' History of the United States (ReVisioning American History) https://www.amazon.com/Indigenous-Peoples-History-ReVisioning-American/dp/0807057835, Westerners were not explorers, but savage, genocidal pirates who exterminated about 100 million natives in the New World alone. It was no different in Africa and Asia, where the great Indian philosopher Dharampal calculated that British killed up to 500 million of his fellow citizens in the Crown Jewel alone (http://www.swaraj.org/shikshantar/resources_dharampal.html), and others get verifiable numbers as high as 1.8 billion (https://sites.google.com/site/muslimholocaustmuslimgenocide/indian-holocaust). The West has committed the greatest crimes against humanity, one terrifying global holocaust after another, yet the vast majority of the world’s people consider Caucasians to be morally and spiritually superior to their own civilizations. This Western myth is taken as gospel in China too. Several Chinese friends have told me that in school, they learned that Christopher Columbus was a great and daring explorer who “discovered” the New World. In fact, he was personally responsible for the extermination of millions of natives, (http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/TPV3/Past-News.php/2013/10/12/christopher-columbus-and-the-genocide-of-1). Chinese friends have told me they are taught the whitewashed myth of “Western exploration”, yet every other European “explorer” pirate after Columbus just multiplied his genocidal game plan by many magnitudes. I have talked to hundreds of Chinese citizens across the country, from all walks of life who told me that “the West and its institutions are morally and intellectually better than we are”. This is tragic evidence of the deep state’s incredibly successful propaganda, perfected over the last 2,500 years. By exposing the reality of the West’s marauding piracy around the world in the 15th-20th centuries, Western Racist Superiority Paradigm Number 3 (moral and spiritual superiority), becomes a shameful farce. And what better way to contrast the West’s ignominious, ongoing colonialism, to the nonviolent, peaceful blueprint of China’s BRI? The second Western myth about the Age of Exploration is that Caucasians were technologically superior to anyone else at that time, including the Chinese. Even if you only accept the standard narrative that Chinese Admiral Zheng He’s exploration was limited to Asia and the east coast of Africa, this myth is totally false. But, 99% of the world’s non-Chinese don’t know this. As well, my Chinese friends tell me that everything they learned at school about Zheng He was reduced to one paragraph, even though he was by far one of history’s greatest navigators and explorers. But the real lie is that Westerners “discovered” the New World. Gavin Menzies, in his majestic books, 1421 and 1434 (http://www.gavinmenzies.net/), proves beyond a shadow of a doubt – with physical evidence, that Zheng He and his captains landed all over the Western hemisphere, long before Columbus was even born. The American Public Broadcasting System (government owned) did a nice 2-hour documentary on Mr. Menzies’ 1421, but only aired it once and it was soon forgotten (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4yK-9hxk5HY). In the meantime, the deep state mainstream media has spent much time and energy refuting all of Menzies’ years of research. I bought into this propaganda myself for ten years, before finally reading his books. I was speechless. The evidence is overwhelming. Alongside BRI’s 21st Century Maritime Silk Road, China should be juxtaposing the truth about its intellectual, creative and moral superiority in the 15th century. Attacking this Western false narrative undermines all three Racist Paradigms, since the Chinese explored, traded and left colonies across the New World much earlier, without exterminating millions of natives in the process. Ironically, the Chinese colonies that started in the New World in the early 15th century were also decimated by the West’s pirates, starting with Columbus in 1492, along with all their indigenous neighbors. Germ Warfare during the Korean War To understand how fearful the West is of the world learning about America’s germ warfare during the Korean War, one only has to look at the current situation, seventy years later. After the United Nations Report of the International Scientific Commission for the Investigation of the Facts Concerning Bacterial Warfare in Korea and China (ISCR) was released in 1952, it was viciously attacked and incessantly suppressed by the mainstream media across the West nonstop, year after year. This ruthless campaign of total media blackout and censorship was conducted in a transatlantic, coordinated fashion. The ISC’s most famous member, Dr. Joseph Needham, was savagely vilified and his reputation trashed for years thereafter. While he always maintained the truth of the report, the mainstream media made sure that the world thought he had recanted. However many copies of the ISCR were published, the deep state went to extraordinary extremes to find them and destroy them (https://mronline.org/2017/09/11/a-lost-document-from-the-cold-war/). How rare is a copy of this 667-page tome, on printed paper? The last known English language copy in print was sold at auction in 2013 (https://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2015/06/09/Report-claiming-biological-weapons-deployed-in-Korea-up-for-auction/9861433861216/), and never saw the light of day thereafter. I think we can guess that the deep state paid any price to buy it and keep it censored. Japan recently came clean about its use of bio- and chemical weapons during World War II and admitted to its infamous Unit 731 in Harbin, China (http://chinarising.puntopress.com/2017/08/19/japan-admits-bio-and-chemical-weapons-use-in-wwii-when-will-the-us-come-clean-china-rising-radio-sinoland-170819/). I bought two copies of the 1952 ISC report in Chinese from book dealers in China, which I have in hand, as well as an original copy of “Our Complaint” (我们的投诉), which contains citizens’ testimonies of America’s many crimes against humanity in their villages. Amazingly, a colleague of mine found the long-lost English version of the ISCR on Google Books and he managed to download a high-quality PDF of it, making it available for the whole world. He, other writers and I went on to create the Bioweapon Truth Commission (BWTC) and its Global Online Library (GOL: www.bioweapontruth.com). Having reviewed the ISCR, it is easy to see why the deep state has pathologically worked for 70 years to keep the ISCR flushed down the Orwellian Memory Hole, helping to assure that America’s use of bioweapons during the Korean War would remain expunged from human consciousness. This is because the ISCR is so detailed and so complete, that it absolutely proves the demonic truth about the West. Americans’ use of Unit 731’s bioweapon technology in Korea strikes a powerful blow to Western Racist Superiority Paradigm Number 3, that they are morally and spiritually superior. Exposing this truth will go a long way to weakening the West’s vaunted “shining beacon on a hill” reputation, giving China added breathing space to promote and protect its noble, cooperative and win-win BRI. The John F. Kennedy (JFK), Martin Luther King Jr. (MLK) and Robert F. Kennedy (RFK) assassinations If you believe that JFK was murdered by the lone communist Lee Harvey Oswald, then even in the United States, you are in the minority. Ever since the bogus Warren Commission came out with its sham report in 1963, a majority of American citizens still believe that he was killed by the deep state (http://news.gallup.com/poll/165893/majority-believe-jfk-killed-conspiracy.aspx). In the aforementioned book, China Rising, the chapter, “On this 9/11: why John F. Kennedy was killed by the deep state, in America’s first coup d’état”, Pages 52-55, does a thorough job of explaining what Americans already know in their guts is the truth. James Douglass’s JFK and the Unspeakable: Why He Died and Why It Matters (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/oliver-stone/jfk-and-the-unspeakable_b_243924.html) includes in-depth research and detail. It’s no different with Martin Luther King Jr.’s murder. In 1999, the King family conducted a civil trial, which was filled with sworn testimony and affidavits (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2015/01/martin-luther-king-assassinated-us-govt-king-family-civil-trial-verdict.html). The jury only took minutes to convict the US government for Dr. King’s killing. Thanks to the courageous work of the King’s lawyer, William F. Pepper, a solid US majority believes the deep state was responsible for Martin Luther King’s murder (http://www.pollingreport.com/race2.htm). Mr. Pepper has written the definitive account of this sordid saga, naming names, including the Memphis hospital director who suffocated Dr. King to death with a pillow, after he arrived, still alive: The Plot to Kill King: The Truth Behind the Assassination of Martin Luther (https://www.amazon.com/Plot-Kill-King-Behind-Assassination/dp/1510702172). One of his interviews about this book and with its closing comments about JFK makes for spine tingling listening (http://noliesradio.org/archives/118087). Mr. Pepper has now turned his attention to Robert F. Kennedy’s assassination and is representing RFK’s patsy “killer”, Sirhan Sirhan, in a civil case, using the same successful game plan as the MLK trial (https://whowhatwhy.org/2013/04/05/rfk-assassination-legal-case-update/). He has all the evidence that RFK was killed by the US government, but it takes years to push a case like this to justice. The truth about these three state sponsored murders of America’s own leaders shatters beyond any reasonable doubt the West’s Racist Superiority Paradigm Number 3. Bringing them to light in every country where China is cooperating with BRI, should be included in its propaganda strategy. Apollo moon landings Until this year, I always wondered about whether the Americans landed men on the moon, during the Apollo Space Project, 1969-1972. Any doubt was shattered, by reading David McGowan’s Wagging the Moondoggie: Parts I-XIV, available for free online (http://centerforaninformedamerica.com/moondoggie-1/). Like me, you will laugh at yourself for your gullibility and innocence, swallowing such a humongous fabrication all your life. How did they pull it off? The joke at NASA was that, “We have Hollywood and the Soviets don’t”, and that sums up the truth. You come to realize that the deep state can make all of humanity believe anything – absolutely anything. After reading Mr. McGowan’s detailed and factually demonstrated book, anybody with a minimum knowledge of science knows humankind has never been beyond the Van Allen radiation belts, just a few hundred kilometers into space. Unlike the aforementioned three assassinations, only a small percentage of Americans believe the moon landings were staged (http://news.gallup.com/poll/3712/landing-man-moon-publics-view.aspx). Debunking this colossal lie destroys all three Racist Superiority Paradigms, that Westerners are smarter, more creative and morally superior. Once all the background is explained in the Moondoggie book, it is easy to show people the truth, because it is so obvious, and is more easily accepted, since it is less ideological. So, this is easily the best weak link to attack first, in support of BRI. September 11, 2001 (9-11) The staged explosions on September 11, 2001, that brought down three NYC skyscrapers, blew up the Pentagon and in a supposed plane crash in a Pennsylvania field were manifestly false flags. The China Rising chapter, “Deep State West (Wing)” explains the absurdity of the 9-11 official cover-up. Even a majority of Americans think there was a cover-up about 9/11 (https://yougov.co.uk/news/2013/09/12/new-poll-finds-most-americans-open-alternative-911/ and https://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/October2006/141006poll.htm), and these numbers continue to grow every year. Exposing this heinous Western crime against humanity makes a powerful juxtaposition to China’s noble and cooperative BRI vision and proves that the West’s Racist Superiority Paradigm Number 3 is a myth. *** I appreciate the fact that this kind of counterpunching against a foe is not something the Chinese establishment is fond of doing. But the circumstances in the West, with its dangerous decline, a demagogue in the White House and the human race on the precipice of nuclear holocaust, all calls for exceptional means. Not to mention that in spite of all this, the West’s Racist Superiority Paradigm continues to keep a stranglehold on the world’s peoples, ironically, most of whom are victims of Eurangloland’s (NATO, Europe plus Australia, New Zealand and Israel) imperial colonialism. Unless its paradigm is undermined and discredited – the sooner the better – the West can continue to be in a position to sabotage China’s BRI, as well as tyrannize all of BRI’s cooperative partners. How can China achieve this, subtly and adroitly, without blaring large headlines on the front page of the People’s Daily, “AMERICA’S MOON LANDINGS WERE A HOAX!” First, it must be realized that doing so is not that outrageous, since a growing number of Westerners already doubt the official stories being maintained by the deep state. There is already a swelling movement in the US to expose Columbus for what he was, and to change Columbus Day to “Indigenous People’s Day” (http://theantimedia.org/8-cities-that-finally-removed-columbus-from-columbus-day/ and http://www.wowt.com/content/news/Movement-to-replace-Columbus-Day-with-Indigenous-Peoples-Day-gains-momentum-in-US-cities-450024863.html). Yes, world history will be rewritten when China opens its remaining Ming Dynasty archives on Zheng He, and when Gavin Menzies finds the money he needs (something China should finance 100%) to complete his research on China’s precocious presence in the New World, but humanity is owed the truth and the Chinese people deserve to have their story told. It is a moral imperative to expose America’s germ warfare crimes in Korea. A majority of Americans know in their hearts that their own government perpetrated the murders of JFK, MLK and RFK, as well as 9-11. The world’s people also deserve the truth about the complete Hollywood fabrication of the moon landings. And this brings up a good point. By doing all of this, China will burnish its reputation around the world for “seeking truth from facts”, which is popularly practiced in the history of the CPC, and before, going back to the Tang Dynasty. The world’s peoples will respect and appreciate China for setting the record straight, which will cast a shining light of truth and justice on BRI. This will enhance trust and confidence in Chinese civilization that BRI needs, to have maximum success over the next 100 years. Here are some ideas to discuss: Chinese media has its new China Global Television Network (CGTN), as well as China Central Television (CCTV) in foreign languages. Both can create extended series of documentaries, not just one-off videos that don’t gain traction. On a regular and long-term basis, they can invite many different experts on the air and report discoveries and information circulating about these topics. As Edward Bernays has proved since he wrote Propaganda (http://whale.to/b/bernays.pdf), doing a one-off report will fail. This is why PBS could show its aforementioned 1421 documentary once and not worry about a groundswell of interest to rewrite the history books, which is of course being fought ferociously by the deep state. Repetition and saturation are the key, as we can see all over China, with the Party’s socialist propaganda. Russia and China are expanding cooperation in media and propaganda (https://gbtimes.com/china-russia-boost-media-cooperation). However, two other anti-imperial, socialist media outlets need to be invited too, to create a global colossus, that can compete with BBC, CNN and Fox News. They are Iran’s Press TV (http://www.presstv.com/) and Latin America’s TeleSUR (https://www.telesurtv.net/english/index.html). To date, Press TV is the only one that reports on the West’s false flags and is debunking its myths, with RT starting to do so, too. Russian, Chinese and Latino allied networks need to join with Press TV and plan a long-term global strategy to destroy the West’s Racist Superiority Paradigm, while promoting BRI and other cooperative efforts, like the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB), Brazil+Russia+India+China+South Africa (BRICS), Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO), Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) and Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO). *** In closing, it is clear that the historical precedence of the West trying to overthrow the CPC and sabotage the country’s global economic cooperation will increase, as BRI continues to make inroads with traditional imperial client states. These Western satraps can pay a very heavy price for working with China, so China needs to respect and respond to the terrible risks they take, for cooperating with the Chinese. China has two choices. It can continue to play the long game and hope that Western empire collapses, without world history adding a nuclear holocaust to the textbooks. If that happens, BRI is of no use anyway. Or, China can short circuit this eventuality, by destroying the West’s Racist Superiority Paradigm. The only way to do this is to debunk the deep state’s masterful global propaganda machine. And that means exposing all the myths and false flags that keep the world’s peoples brainwashed. Otherwise, the West and Israel can start World War III and in the eyes of humanity, make sure that China takes all the blame. Something to think about, discuss and hopefully take a new tack. Thank you for reading. Key words: Belt and Road Initiative, Donald Trump, Communist Party of China, New Era of Chinese Socialism, Western Empire, Xi Jinping, Eurasia, Capitalism, Colonialism, 9-11, 36 Stratagems of War, Nuclear Holocaust *
Bio: Jeff J. Brown is a geopolitical
analyst, journalist, lecturer and the author of The China Trilogy. It
consists of 44 Days Backpacking in China – The Middle Kingdom in the 21st
Century, with the United States, Europe and the Fate of the World in Its
Looking Glass (2013); Punto Press released China Rising – Capitalist Roads,
Socialist Destinations (2016); and for Badak Merah, Jeff authored China Is
Communist, Dammit! – Dawn of the Red Dynasty (2017). As well, he published a
textbook, Doctor WriteRead’s Treasure Trove to Great English (2015). Jeff is
a Senior Editor & China Correspondent for The Greanville Post, where he
keeps a column, Dispatch from Beijing and is a Global Opinion Leader at 21st
Century. He also writes a column for The Saker, called the Moscow-Beijing
Express. Jeff writes, interviews and podcasts on his own program, China
Rising Radio Sinoland, which is also available on YouTube, SoundCloud,
Stitcher Radio, iTunes, Ivoox and RUvid. Guests have included Ramsey Clark,
James Bradley, Moti Nissani, Godfree Roberts, Hiroyuki Hamada, The Saker,
and many others.
10
November 2012, 19:30
In an event that takes place every ten years the People’s Republic of China
has gathered to choose new leaders. Amid extremely tight security and little
information being readily available China watchers are struggling to fathom
what the future direction of the country will be. This will be made clear
when the congress is completed but statements by outgoing leader Hu Jintao
give us a very good indication.
The People’s Republic of China has begun the process of reforming their
power structure and selecting new members to leadership positions during the
current 18th Congress of the Communist Party of the People’s Republic of
China.
The process of changing the leadership of the country takes place once every
ten years and involves a gathering of China’s Communist Party delegates from
all over the Republic.
While the West is full of talks of reforms and changes in their never ending
desire to see the Communist country collapse, Chinese leader Hu Jintao has
made it clear that China is not going to change. The path of Socialism with
a Chinese Character will be continued and made stronger and continue to be
built upon.
This week the leadership will be announced after they are formally appointed
by the Central Committee to their respective positions, the Central
Committee is chosen in turn by the approximately 2,987 delegates of the
Party Congress.
The makeup of the Communist Government includes the head, the Secretary
General of the Party, or the “President” as he is commonly referred to in
the West, followed by 9 members of the Politburo Standing Committee, then 24
members of the Politburo itself who answer to the Central Committee which is
made up of 204 members and has 167 alternate lower ranking members, they in
turn answer to the Party Congress made up of approximately 2,400 delegates.
Secretary General Hu Jintao began the congress by addressing the delegates
in a speech that has seen no end of analysis by the West. Among his main
points was a call to continue to fight corruption at all levels. He was
unusually strong in his language for calling for all to be treated equally
when it came to answering for corruption related offenses and crimes against
the people, “No one is allowed to place oneself above the party
organization. We must ensure that all are equal before discipline.”
Reflected the unrest amongst the Chinese people and the seriousness of the
problem Hu made it clear that if something is not done it could lead to the
end of the Socialist China as a whole and the 91 year old party: “If we fail
to handle this issue well, it could prove fatal to the party and even cause
the collapse of the party and the fall of the state, we must strengthen
education about combating corruption and promote clean government and
improve the culture of clean government. A tough position on cracking down
on corruption must be maintained at all times, and thorough investigations
into major corruption cases must take place and we must work hard to resolve
problems of corruption that directly affect the people.” Hu said in his
statement.
The West of course is in a quandary as little information is being made
available by the party as to the direction they are going to take and calls
to end corruption only add to the West’s worries as they affect Western
attempts at economic manipulation and the subversion of the Communist system
of the People’s Republic.
As China is the most populated country on Earth and the US is extremely
dependent on China economically, new policies by China could make or break
the US economy, especially at a time when it is weak and depends on
affordable Chinese exports and huge Chinese investment to keep it afloat,
anti-Communist rhetoric is kept to a minimum as are any moves to upset the
superpower.
Chinese sentiment toward the US is at a low reflected by a US Embassy
“election party” at a ballroom in a Beijing hotel that fell flat on its face
as most of the invited officials did not attend. Chinese security services
questioned an American diplomat as the party was conducted without the
permission of the authorities. The American diplomat arrogantly answered
that they did not need permission.
Another worry for the West has been statements pointing to the intention of
China to become more assertive in protecting its territorial integrity and
maritime interests. During his speech Secretary General Hu Jintao stated
that China is committed to: "enhancing our capacity for exploiting marine
resources … to resolutely safeguard China's maritime rights and interests
and build China into a maritime power.”
During the Congress statements have been made regarding increasing China’s
economic role in the world and strengthening its economic might. Something
China watchers say may be of greatest concern to the West, currently
seriously weakened by an economic crisis and the US in particular which is
also bogged down in military adventures all over the planet.
Unfortunately security is so tight around the congress and it is so
difficult for reporters to get in that there is little detailed information
available as to concrete decisions that are being made, however once the
Congress is complete more information will become available.
Outgoing Secretary General Hu Jintao made an impassioned plea during his
speech regarding correcting problems of concern to society saying, “We must
exalt the true, the good and the beautiful and reject the false, the evil
and the ugly". A very beautiful and eloquent thought, in my opinion, from
the leader of a superpower, it is unfortunate other world leaders do not
share that sentiment. hem some hot food, gave them blankets and resources. We will keep fighting and I will keep talking to you.
|