

Dick "Raving Genocidal Lunatic" Cheney



Finally Kicked the Bucket but Never Paid for
Crimes against Humanity
George H.W. Bush: A Real Racist, Obstructor of Justice and Hardcore War
Criminal
George H.W. Bush’s legacy of failures
Never Forget: George Bush's Wars Set The Stage For 25 Years Of Endless War
How Poppy Bush's Brother, "Uncle Bucky," Made A Killing Off The Iraq Wars

http://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=109905
http://www.jar2.com/Topics/JFK.html
NWO VIPs
George H. W. Bush, Barbara Bush, John McCain, Zbigniew Brzezinski, David
Rockefeller gone: Next?
“GEORGE”:
JFK Jr. told the whole world who killed his father (Video)
George
H.W. Bush: The Most Important Story of His Lifetime
The Forgotten Legacy of George H.W. Bush That the Media Won’t Tell You About
George H.W. Bush: Dynastic death of a major destabilizer in the world

George H.W. Bush: The Secret History of the 41st President of the United
States





Dick Cheney’s Whirlwind Network Tour for the Promotion of Torture Rebutted
and Forwarded to the ICC for Criminal Prosecution - by Joseph Zrnchik
http://jar2.com/1/Archive/2014/December/Cheney_ICC.html
December 2014
Dick Cheney has
admitted to being a key architect of the US torture program. Not only did it
admit it, but he bragged about it. And not only did he brag about it, but he
also stated he would do it again in a second if he faced that choice.
What he
failed to mention is that many of the prisoners who were tortured were
innocent victims sold to the US for bounty money.
Cheney also
failed to mention the fact that neither Iraq nor Saddam had anything to do
with 9/11. And not only does he fail to mention this fact, but he also fails
to mention the fact that while he was directing the torture of innocent
Iraqis, Bush was literally kissing the cheek and holding the hand of a
prince from the brutal Saudi regime that had assisted jihadists in the
perpetration of the 9/11 attack against the US. Saudi involvement in this
attack is still being obscured behind false claims of national security.
In fact, even
before the Bush administration had plotted escape of Saudi royals from the
US in the immediate aftermath of the 9/11 attack, it already had engaged in
secret energy meetings to devise a plan on how to divide up the spoils of an
atomized Iraq.
During the
interview Cheney was then asked if he would consider rectal rehydration to
be a form of torture. He stated that this was not torture and most likely
done only for medical reasons. When asked what he would consider to be
torture, he stated he considered torture to be what was done by al Qaeda to
the people in the World Trade Center. Again, it seems Cheney forgets that
neither Iraq nor Saddam, nor any Iraqi Sunnis or Shiites had anything to do
with 9/11.
Then Dick
Cheney argues that the torture report is flawed because investigators failed
to interview those involved in the program. It is very difficult to conduct
an investigation when the CIA destroyed evidence and many of the people
involved in the torture program had their identities hidden or cited their
Fifth Amendment rights.
Cheney goes
on to argue that the torture program only became a problem when career
politicians began to throw intelligence professionals under the bus. Again
Cheney fails to mention how he and Bush threw CIA professionals under the
bus as they purged the agency of agents who provided intelligence that
proved Iraq and Saddam had nothing to do with 9/ 11 and explained why a war
with Iraq would be the greatest strategic mistake the US had ever made.
Cheney and
Bush as politicians then decided to relieve General Shinseki of command
because he told them it would take twice the number of soldiers to occupy
Iraq as it took to defeat the Iraqi army. Cheney must be hoping that all
Americans are as stupid as those who believe his lies and do not notice his
hypocricy.
As soon as
Bush won the presidency the secret Energy Summit commenced and plans to
invade Iraq had begun to be implemented far prior to 9/11. And after 9/11
when there was no proof of Iraqi involvement and the CIA had stated there
was no connection between Saddam and al Qaeda, Cheney and his gang had
already determined how the spoils from Operation Iraqi Freedom we're going
to be divvied up and what contracts would be provided to Halliburton.
And getting
back to Cheney's quote of opportunistic politicians throwing professionals
under the bus, I wonder if he ever considered how the CIA felt as he created
the Expanded Iraqi Desk which later became known as the Office of Special
Plans whereupon he staffed it with a bunch of political neocon ideologues.
THen, when no WMDs were found, he tried to blame his lies to the American
people on the CIA.
In General
Wesley Clark's famous Youtube video he explains how the Pentagon explained
to the Bush administration that there was no connection between Saddam and
al Qaeda and when asked why Cheney was going to invade Iraq anyway, Cheney
explained to the Pentagon, "Because it's doable."
Cheney then
argues that torture was justified because the people in the CIA stated that
their torture provided actionable intelligence even though this has been
refuted time and time again by people within the CIA who were not given
leadership positions as the result of being neocon ideologues.
Does anyone
actually think that the CIA will not lie to justify and cover its crimes
considering that it has already destroyed evidence that a court had ordered
to be submitted to that branch of government?
Cheney
continues to argue that waterboarding is not torture when in fact the US
Government had executed Japanese officers after WWII for exactly the same
crimes. At that time the US government considered waterboarding a capital
offense punishable by death.
Then Cheney
goes on to justify torture because it had been okayed by the White House
legal counsel that the president had personally staffed with more neocon
ideologues. It does not matter what some lawyers say with regard to
justifying torture. International law is clear in this respect and provides
no justification under any circumstance for the implementation of torture.
In the video
Cheney again argues that the torture program is being misrepresented by the
fact that key people were not questioned. Besides the destruction of
evidence and the citing of Fifth Amendment rights against
self-incrimination, there is also the fact that people like Director James
Clapper of the NSA and CIA Director Michael Hayden never tell the truth even
when being placed under oath and subject to the penalties of perjury for
lying to and misleading Congress. Clapper and Hayden can rest assured that
they will never be called to account for perjury or high crimes, much less
misdemeanors. But the fact is that they ought to be charged with treason by
the US and prosecuted for crimes against peace by the ICC.
When Cheney
was asked if a rectal rehydration what is torture he responded by saying, "I
guess the question is: What are you prepared to do in order to get the truth
about future attacks against the United States? But history, intelligence
experts, and common sense all point to the fact that torture provides
useless and false information whereby victims will say whatever their
tormentors want them to say. Torture provided useless information about
nonexistent weapons of mass destruction. Torture also provided useless
information with regard to evidence used in military tribunals. As a result
of of torture innocent people were wrongly implicated and also thusly
tortured.
I wonder what
Cheney's response would be if asked: What compensation should an innocent
person receive for being a victim of torture and what punishment should be
inflicted upon those who wrongly torture innocents? If torture is okay as a
means with which to collect intelligence on terrorism, and considering the
US government has funded the MEK, PPK, and Jundallah, not to mention
supporting the Sandinistas, various death squads and unsavory dictatorships
such as Saddam's Iraqi Baathist rule and assisting the Shah of Iran in
maintaining power through the SAVAK, does this not then open American
fighting men and US officials to being subject to torture? After all, don't
foreign government have the right to know what crimes the US is going to
commit against them?
Cheney uses
the endorsements of torture from individuals who like him are responsible
for the infliction of atrocities upon innocent human beings, many of whom
were killed in exceedingly gruesome ways. And oh, by the way, let's not
forget the many dozens of prisoners of war who were killed as the result of
torture, many of them being Iraqi military officers who should have been
protected by the Geneva and Hague Conventions by strictures that should have
been held to be inviolable. Saddam was demonized and yet even he did not
resort to torture against any Americans even though the US invaded his
country under false pretenses by waging an illegal and aggressive war that
had been planned prior to 9/11.
While Cheney
continually brings up the 2000 that were killed in the World Trade Center,
he fails to mention the hundreds of thousands of Iraqis who were killed that
were completely innocent of the 9/11 terrorist attack. I am sure Iraqi
Sunnis would have been willing to blame Iraqi Shiites and vice versa for an
attack that was committed by George Bush's best friends in the Saudi
government.
The fact is
is torture is used by governments to get it victims to say whatever it is
they want their victims to say. Hand Dick Cheney over to ISIS and I am sure
they can get him to admit to taking down the Twin Towers.
Don't be a
fool. Look and read what the neocons have written in their "Project for a
New American Century". Their plan was to take down seven governments in five
years. The problem is that Russia and Iran now know, understand and believe
that the US is executing its plan for global domination and are countering
it with the help of China.
The
International Criminal Court will now have to decide if it wants to tie its
legitimacy to the sinking credibility of the United States, or will it seek
to promote international justice.
In addition
to the above article I also forwarded the following letter to the Office of
the Prosecutor for the ICC. It reads:
Information
and Evidence Unit
Office of the
Prosecutor
Attn: Mrs.
Fatou Bensouda, ICC Prosecutor
Post Office
Box 19519
2500 CM The
Hague
The
Netherlands
Dear Madam
Prosecutor and Honorable Officials of Office of the Prosecutor,
I am a
retired American Army officer who believes in the rule of international law.
As all U.S. soldiers are ordered to duty to fight in foreign lands and have
no recourse but to serve under the threat of prison even for conflicts that
are clearly violations of international law, it is imperative that you
prosecute American officials for war crimes, crimes against humanity and
crimes against peace itself.
If the ICC
charges U.S. officials, I am sure there will be some soldiers who will
decide not to fight and justify their decision as a refusal to participate
in war crimes and crimes against humanity. This action will serve to help
erode support for future illegal wars in which the U.S. will participate. If
the ICC takes no action, its dereliction will ensure there are more
Iraq-type wars in Africa, Eastern Europe and the Middle East. Moreover, we
will see governments continue to perpetrate false flag operations as we have
with the U.S. and EU falsely blaming the downing of Malaysian Flight MH17 on
Russia. It is clear that with Malaysia being excluded from the investigative
body the world has little chance of learning the truth about Flight MH17 as
the U.S. hides its advanced signal and imaging intelligence products, radio
traffic and radar recordings from international scrutiny and world opinion.
What ought to
be clear to the ICC is the fact that the U.S now lies like the Israelis and
the Israelis lie like people blink. With the destruction of Libya
perpetrated by the U.S. and NATO over false claims of deterring impending
genocide by Gaddafi, the U.S. now reasons Russia and China will not
interfere with its plans to continue regional destabilization and the
breakdown of international law and order. If Russia and China are to deter
U.S. crimes against peace, they will need the U.S to be called to account by
an international organization of justice. Therefore, it is imperative that
the ICC at least provides precedence for the beginning of the establishment
of some checks and balances upon U.S. unilateralism, belligerence and
militarism.
The ICC
should not worry that the U.S. will refuse to cooperate with the ICC
regarding its targeting of African leaders for whom the U.S. provides
intelligence and evidence to the ICC. It is assured the U.S. will always
cooperate with the ICC in situations where it believes its interests are
being served. Accordingly, if there is an anti-U.S. government, dictatorship
or junta committing crimes, or if there is a foreign government committing
crimes that interferes with U.S. plans for hegemony, you can rest assured
the U.S. will continue to cooperate when such cooperation serves U.S.
interests.
If the ICC
does not have the power to enforce international law against the most
powerful and states and so chooses not even attempt to enforce law because
it does not have the ability to enforce its will, justice is not nearly so
harmed as when a crime is simply ignored because a powerful nation tells
others no crime has been committed and then coerces an international body
into becoming the U.S.’s de facto accomplice.
U.S. war
criminals will use the ICC’s failure to call their crimes a crime as a means
of legitimizing their past actions and gaining support for future actions.
The ICC should work to delegitimize the illegal actions of the U.S. and
understand that this would serve as a means of gaining international
legitimacy with the Non-Aligned Movement, the BRICS nations, and nations of
the G20 who oppose U.S. hegemony.
The U.S
continues to lose international legitimacy with each criminal act it
commits. If the ICC simply ignores these crimes its international legitimacy
and subsequent decline will be closely tied to that of the U.S.’s. With
every illegal act committed by the U.S. that is overlooked by the ICC, the
Court’s legitimacy will be irrevocably harmed.
The American
people need to understand the criminality of Bush family that goes back to
Operation Desert Storm’s “Highway of Death” war crime and leads up to
Operation Iraqi Freedom’s JSOC raids in which illegal killings were covered
up by digging the bullets out of the dead bodies of children and expectant
mothers.
I hope this
letter allows you to better understand your responsibilities to the innocent
victims of the war the U.S. continues to create on a global basis as it
armed the very insurgents that now grew into al Qaeda and ISIS that have
caused the deaths of tens of thousands of innocents. The U.S.’s past crimes
have become the attendant evils of aggressive war that serve to foment
violence, sectarian slaughter and all of war’s other encompassing evils. The
people of the world, including the U.S., do want a new world order – one
based on the unassailability of international justice.
We Americans
have now become victims of our own government and the crimes that were once
only visited upon the innocent people of the world are now being visited
upon us. We have no more rights and are often the victim of many forms of
domestic tyranny. Our police, courts and political process have now all
become corrupted and all Americans are now at the mercy of a government that
has been held unaccountable for torture, illegal renditions, extra-judicial
assassinations and the indefinite detention of those even military tribunals
have deemed innocent. Detainees are now held just to prevent the world from
knowing more about U.S. torture and to prevent legal accountability.
The world
needs to be provided justice. Its politicians need to be held accountable.
As you know with the government of Ukraine shooting down Flight MH17 and
ISIS fighters using chemical weapons in the hope of drawing the U.S. into a
war for which the U.S. was initially seeking a casus belli so as to begin
attacks on Syria before it determined that ISIS is now the bigger threat, it
is easy to see that politicians are quite often knaves and fools that the
world must not be made to suffer.
You have duty
to bring about a more just world. Please decide to give rise to that
reality.
Sincerely,
Joseph
Zrnchik
P.S. As the
U.S. government is now known to interfere with email through its National
Security Agency, I kindly ask for acknowledgement of receipt by the ICC.

Copyright
JAR2 2003-2103 All Rights Reserved
Publishing Banned Truth Since June 06, 2003
|
|